Print this article
P. 44-49 /

Heterocat, homocat and biocat
What does better flow?

corresponding

VOLKER HESSEL*, TIMOTHY NOËL
Laboratory of Chemical Reactor Engineering/Micro Flow Chemistry and Process Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
*Member of Chimica Oggi – Chemistry Today Scientific Advisory Board

Abstract

Flow chemistry meanwhile has become almost regular branch of (synthetic) chemistry. Catalytic microreactors have also caught some attention; most prominently for small auxiliary power units driven by fuel processing. Under this umbrella, a kind of flow catalysis has emerged. Point is now is this “just” catalysis in flow or does the term justify – likewise Flow Chemistry – an own consideration? This sheds light in more general terms on the question how to treat the term Flow Catalysis emerging “interdisciplines” in a time having “Technology Convergence” as a megatrend. Who is responsible for nanotechnology and who might be for flow catalysis (e.g. for the teaching curriculum)? Moreover, the question is approach if flow will impact the balance within the trinity of heterogeneous-, homogeneous- and biocatalysts.


 

Flow chemistry is more than microreactors
Flow chemistry is the chemists taking up and interpreting microreactor technology developed by the engineers. While so simplifying the equipment on the one side (towards capillaries, T mixers, and so on), flow chemistry gave emphasis on new aspects not covered so much by the previous microreactor development. This is, among others, the focus on online and inline process analytics finally leading to process-analytical technology or even complex process automation, e.g. for computer-assisted kinetic model development. The chemists have also much contributed to the development of proper flow separations. Most importantly, flow extractions (typical done in segmented flow mode) with integrated phase separation